Interview: Joseph Gordon-Levitt talks 'Looper'




Joseph Gordon-Levitt is the man of the hour. Hot off his hilarious gig hosting Saturday Night Live last week, it seems like Gordon-Levitt is everywhere; he starred in this summer’s biggest blockbuster, “The Dark Knight Rises,” the action-packed bicycle-chase movie “Premium Rush,” and come November you’ll see him starring alongside Daniel Day-Lewis in Steven Spielberg’s much-anticipated “Lincoln.” As if all that’s not enough, he’s also currently working on his directorial debut, “Don Jon’s Addiction,” while always making time for his company, “hitRECord” – an open-collaboration online production company which has its members work together to produce everything from films and music to short stories and photography. In his latest film, “Looper” (out in theaters today), he plays a specialized hit man whose job is to eliminate targets sent to him from the future. To play the daring role, Gordon-Levitt teamed up with writer/director Rian Johnson, whom he previously worked with on the acclaimed high school noir film “Brick” – which is precisely where my conversation with the down-to-Earth young actor began.


What is it about Rian that makes you want to work with him?

JGL: Well first of all I just love him, he’s a great friend of mine. We’ve been close ever since we made “Brick” together. So it’s rare that you get to work with someone you know personally and are close friends with. So that’s the first thing. And I also just – even if I didn’t know him – I think I’d be an enormous fan of his. He makes movies that are sincere and intriguing and unpredictable and fun, and, you know, that’s what I want.

What kind of prep work did you do to play a younger version of Bruce Willis?

JGL: Well, I studied him. I studied his movies, I watched a lot of his movies. I would rip the audio off of his movies, and put that on my iPod so I could listen to him…Bruce even recorded himself doing some of my voiceover lines and sent that to me so that I could listen to that. But the most important thing I think was just getting to know him and spending time with him, hanging out, having lunch, having dinner, talking…and letting it seep in.

In the movie you make a lot of decisions that are kind of difficult for a human being to make, and you choose characters that kind of have dark complexes -- I haven’t seen you play a role this dark since “Mysterious Skin” -- so is it really difficult for you to put yourself in that situation?

JGL: You’re right, and that’s one of my favorite things about “Looper” and I’m glad you brought that up…there’s a lot of moral ambiguity in it and I think that’s realistic for the way the world is in real life. No one is black or white, everyone is a shade of grey, and while it is a convenient and often crowd pleasing device to have heroes and villains, that’s not really the way the world is. And in “Looper” every character feels like they’re doing the right thing, and there’s some horrible, atrocious things happening. And that’s violence for you. And “Looper” is really the story about the source of violence and how violence begets violence and whether you can solve any problems with more violence.

Are we going to see a trailer for “Don Jon’s Addiction” any time soon?

JGL: We finished shooting about two months ago and we’re in the process of editing it now…Scarlett [Johansson] did a really good job; she’s playing this character that’s I think really different than anything she’s played before. Julianne Moore is, I think, you know, one of the greatest actors alive; Tony Danza played my dad, he’s also really different than you’re used to seeing him. And I had a ball, man, I’m just having a great time.

What’s it like directing yourself?

JGL: Yeah it’s, you know, it’s something that I’ve been working up to for a while and I do feel that, like, the time I’ve spent with hitRECord was important in being able to do that. Because I’ve practiced seeing myself on screen – and that can be a disturbing or odd experience for many actors, and I remember it used to be for me. It’s just really a matter of practice, to get used to it. If you’ve spent enough time looking at yourself eventually you get used to it, and those feelings of anxiety go away and you’re able to, you know, kind of be productive and analyze it more objectively. So all these little videos that I’ve been making for years on hitRECord I think really helped me be able to look at the monitor, see myself, and not just be like ‘Oh god, I look so weird!’

Do you experience that in “Looper,” because of all of the special effects make-up?

JGL: Well it’s actually just the opposite, because I see someone else, which is, you know, really reassuring, ‘cause that’s what I wanna see when I see a movie that I’m in – I wanna see somebody else. I feel like if it’s reminding me of myself then I’m not doing the job right, you know, so, the make-up certainly helps that. And that’s my favorite thing as an actor, to become somebody else and so I think “Looper” is really the most transformative role that I’ve gotten to do.  And I love it for that. 

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

Movie Review: 'The Perks of Being a Wallflower'



Coming-of-age high school movies are a cliché in and of itself. So for a film to take that subject matter on without any real plot to back it up – and for it to feel like a movie we’ve never seen before – is quite a remarkable feat alone. But “The Perks of Being a Wallflower” isn’t just new and fresh; it’s filled with a zestful spirit that can’t help but fill you with sentimental longing for days and years gone by.
Based off of the incredibly popular 1999 novel of the same name, “Perks” is narrated by Charlie (Logan Lerman); he’s a shy and introverted high school freshman, and very much a loner. That is, until two eccentric seniors, Sam (Emma Watson) and Patrick (Ezra Miller), take him under their wing and invite him into their group of friends, helping Charlie navigate through the often tumultuous waves of high school.
The author of the novel, Stephen Chbosky, also wrote and directed the movie. It’s evident how much he loves these characters, and it’s a love that doesn’t get lost in translation. This is, by all means, a perfect book-to-film adaptation; nothing of importance is sacrificed, and in some cases things are even improved upon in their transition to the big screen. The movie deals with some pretty intense and controversial issues, such as mental illness, suicide, and sexual abuse, but in Chbosky’s hands, everything is handled gracefully, with tact, and just the right amount of emotion. Thankfully, the movie never veers into after school special mode, something it could have very easily done. Chbosky resists the urge to lecture us, or treat the audience like children – and it’s precisely that that makes both his novel, and the film version, something that easily connects with people of all ages.
This isn’t a teen movie, it’s not begging for the adoration of the “Twilight” young adult crowd – it’s a movie that takes its high school setting and uses it to appeal to your nostalgia. We watch Charlie go to his first party, get high for the first time, go on his first date, experience his first kiss. And it works so well because while it can’t help but take you back to the first time you yourself experienced all of those things, it’s more than that -- you just really want to tirelessly root for Charlie every single step of the way.


In fact, the characters – and how much we grow to love and care about those characters – is the heart and soul of “The Perks of Being a Wallflower.” Logan Lerman’s Charlie is incredibly awkward and innocent, but that’s part of what makes him such a sweet, endearing character right from the get-go. Lerman has this sort of face, his eyes in particular, that pull you in because they’re just so filled with emotion. Throughout the movie, I constantly found myself going “awww” out loud…a verbal slip I can only attribute to the fact that I was just so damn invested in the growing relationship between Charlie, Sam, and Patrick that I couldn’t help myself. I wanted – needed – these characters to be happy in the end.
As Charlie’s new best friends, Watson and Miller shine. Miller proves just how much range he has, making the huge jump from playing a murderous teenager in last year’s “We Need to Talk About Kevin” to the flamboyant, lovable, and hilarious Patrick. Playing his stepsister Sam, Emma Watson takes on her first big post-Potter role with maturity, proving she’s more than just the clever witch we all know her as. This is Watson like you’ve never seen her before; she radiates confidence and sex appeal (in one scene, we see her decked out in lingerie, playing Janet in “The Rocky Horror Picture Show”), and she showcases a sort of loose, free-spirit vibe that makes it entirely evident why Charlie is so drawn to her.
Set in the early 90s, one of the most memorable aspects of the film is the wonderfully hip soundtrack, filled with tracks from artists such as The Smiths and Sonic Youth. In what is surely predestined to become the film’s most iconic scene, Patrick races his pick-up truck through a tunnel while Sam stands up on the truck bed, screaming with her arms in the air while David Bowie’s “Heroes” so fittingly plays in the background. And it’s that very scene that captures the true essence of “The Perks of Being a Wallflower.” It’s a film that’s tender, heartfelt, and even a little sad…but more than anything, it’ll make you feel infinite.
Rating: A

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

Movie Review: 'The Master'




Usually you sit through a movie, and by time the credits start to roll, you’ve made up your mind about what you just watched. Sure, you may need to let it marinate in your mind a bit before making any firm proclamations -- but you usually know, at the very least, whether you liked it or not. I’m not so sure The Master operates in such simple terms. As people shuffled out of the theater, I remained seated, with one thought running through my head: what did I just watch?
The Master acts as writer-director Paul Thomas Anderson’s most challenging and perplexing work to date. While many have pinned the film “the Scientology movie,” more than anything, it’s an in-depth character study. And in that aspect, The Master succeeds brilliantly. Joaquin Phoenix plays Freddie Quell, a disturbed WWII vet who, while in a drunken stupor, sneaks aboard a party yacht that belongs to a beguiling man named Lancaster Dodd (Philip Seymour Hoffman). Bearing striking similarities to the Church of Scientology founder L. Ron Hubbard, Dodd is the leader of a cult-like, faith-based organization called “The Cause.” Soon thereafter, Freddie becomes both Dodd’s right-hand man and guinea pig – forming a conundrum of a relationship that is just as fascinating to watch as the individual characters themselves.
As Freddie, Phoenix is nothing short of astounding. Freddie isn’t likable, not by a long shot; he’s crass, ill mannered, erratic and at times downright violent. Phoenix plays Freddie with a constant air of unpredictability and foreboding. When he was on screen, it’s nearly impossible to be fully at ease. More than that though, Phoenix brings these odd mannerisms and little idiosyncrasies to Freddie that make him not just a fully realized character, but a living, breathing portrait of a disturbed man. From his lopsided snarl to his slightly unhinged laugh, this performance is the true essence of what the best actor Academy Award is all about – and you can be sure that no one deserves that title this year more than Joaquin Phoenix.
Being the visual artist that he is, Anderson creates a distinct tone that is more telling of the film’s overall meaning than any one scene. This is a movie that operates best when you commit to it, take it all in and appreciate its many individual merits without the need to know what overall purpose it attempts to serve – the type of film that proves to be both rewarding, and at times even frustrating, with its deliberate disconnect. While it very well may be a bit too slow for some viewers (at 137 minutes long, it can’t help but drag), the vibrant cinematography, powerhouse performances by Hoffman and Phoenix, and Jonny Greenwood’s haunting score win out in the end. Even so, the question still remains: what is The Master really about? Like the devoted members of The Cause, are we, the viewers, searching for meaning where there is none? As for the followers of The Cause – almost certainly. As for us – only another viewing could tell for sure.
Rating: B+

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS